Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

Peta Against No Kill Shelters

Peta Against No Kill Shelters. They argue that the animals die in miserable conditions or because the shelters are full (as the video shows), unwanted cats and dogs are cruelly killed, one way and other, by people who don’t want them. Peta takes issue with the no kill movement for promoting cruelty by encouraging the warehousing of animals in overcrowded shelters.

PETA is not entirely correct about nokill policies
PETA is not entirely correct about nokill policies from pictures-of-cats.org

“these people aren’t in the trenches, they’re on facebook,” says nachminovitch. A humane death is better than a slow and painful one. They argue that the animals die in miserable conditions or because the shelters are full (as the video shows), unwanted cats and dogs are cruelly killed, one way and other, by people who don’t want them.

To Us, The Choice Is Obvious.


Peta works to stop the killing of all animals, for food, clothing, experimentation and more, but we can’t—and won’t—turn our backs on dogs and cats in danger of being tossed out or whose owners can’t afford costly euthanasia services. During a discussion that spanned various topics, including feral cats, open admission no kill shelters, the myth of pet overpopulation and adoption incentives by shelters, the conversation invariably ended at the same deadly destination—with the peta employees insisting that it is okay to kill animals to spare them any future suffering and that no matter. Peta's headquarters is in norfolk, virginia, where it operates an animal shelter called peta's community animal project.

They Argue That The Animals Die In Miserable Conditions Or Because The Shelters Are Full (As The Video Shows), Unwanted Cats And Dogs Are Cruelly Killed, One Way And Other, By People Who Don’t Want Them.


Peta puts a high proportion of animals down, nachminovitch explains, because it ministers to those that many other shelters turn away, often because of the shelters’ ”no kill” policies. Peta’s shelter and the problem with the term ‘kill shelter’ peta’s shelter does not and will not ever turn animals away. Peta takes issue with the no kill movement for promoting cruelty by encouraging the warehousing of animals in overcrowded shelters.

Peta Saves Animals | Euthanasia, No Kill, Animal Shelters, And More | Peta.org.


An open admission shelter logically. Winograd's model legislation makes it illegal to kill a shelter animal unless rescue groups have been contacted and are not willing to save the animal. A humane death is better than a slow and painful one.

They Argue That They Actually Slowly Kill Animals.


And don’t let peta’s failure influence your opinion of the animal rights campaign. In pennsylvania, two large shelters, the humane league of lancaster county and the delaware county spca, have gone 'no kill in the last 18 months, leaving police, dog wardens and the public with few options to turn to when they pick. Because they are aggressive, sick, hurt, elderly, or at death's door and because no good homes exist for them.

Since Petakillsanimals.com Debuted In 2005, People Have Frequently Asked Peta Why It Kills So Many Animals.


Peta is mostly known for campaigns against factory farming and animal testing, often exposing unsavoury practices through undercover operations. If, as peta stated in its 2019 vdacs filing, it is an “open admission” shelter, that might explain the high death rate. Peta dubiously claims it does not run a “traditional animal shelter” and that it puts down animals that are too sick or injured to carry on.

Post a Comment for "Peta Against No Kill Shelters"